Re: Wierd context-switching issue on Xeon

From: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Anjan Dave <adave(at)vantage(dot)com>, Dirk Lutzebäck <lutzeb(at)aeccom(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-performance(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Wierd context-switching issue on Xeon
Date: 2004-04-21 02:41:03
Message-ID: 1082515263.1558.214.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

I modified the code in s_lock.c to remove the spins

#define SPINS_PER_DELAY 1

and it doesn't exhibit the behaviour

This effectively changes the code to

while(TAS(lock))
select(10000); // 10ms

Can anyone explain why executing TAS 100 times would increase context
switches ?

Dave

On Tue, 2004-04-20 at 12:59, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Anjan,
>
> > Quad 2.0GHz XEON with highest load we have seen on the applications, DB
> > performing great -
>
> Can you run Tom's test? It takes a particular pattern of data access to
> reproduce the issue.
--
Dave Cramer
519 939 0336
ICQ # 14675561

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-04-21 02:51:15 Re: pgbench written in Pro*C
Previous Message Aaron Werman 2004-04-21 02:14:51 Re: Moving postgres to FC disks