From: | Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Function to kill backend |
Date: | 2004-04-06 19:59:50 |
Message-ID: | 1081281589.56361.602.camel@jester |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2004-04-06 at 15:10, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Bruce,
>
> > OK, you have a runaway report. You want to stop it. Query cancel is
> > only going to stop the current query, and once you do that the next
> > query is fed in so there is no way to actually stop the report,
> > especially if the report is not being run from the same machine as the
> > server (you can't kill the report process). How do you stop it without
> > SIGTERM? You don't want to shut down the postmaster.
>
> Hmmm ... but, at least in the case of my apps, killing the PG connection
> wouldn't fix things. Most apps I work on are designed to detect connection
> failure and reconnect. I suspect that most platforms that use connection
> pooling are the same. So your case would only work if you actually blocked
> all connections from that host -- not a capability we'd discussed.
That would be a likely second step (go into pg_hba to block). But you
still have to get rid of the idlers at some point.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-04-06 20:01:52 | Re: [HACKERS] logging statement levels |
Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2004-04-06 19:58:28 | Re: Function to kill backend |