From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at> |
Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Tuple sampling |
Date: | 2004-05-24 13:43:42 |
Message-ID: | 10795.1085406222@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at> writes:
> Performance was not the primary motivation. I found it confusing to
> have doubles everywhere and not to know whether a variable is declared
> as double, because
> . we need the fractional part (e.g. a probability)
> . or it should be able to hold an integral value of more than 32 bits.
> So I just invented my own datatype for huge integers.
Well, if you want to "typedef double TupleCount" as a documentation aid,
I don't object, but let's not do it just locally in analyze.c. There
are a bunch of other places that do the same thing.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-05-24 14:43:06 | Re: add build utilities in default install |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2004-05-24 10:56:34 | updated list rewrite |