Re: Question on Opteron performance

From: Stephen Robert Norris <srn(at)commsecure(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Nick Barr <nicky(at)chuckie(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: Joseph Shraibman <jks(at)selectacast(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Question on Opteron performance
Date: 2004-03-09 10:19:28
Message-ID: 1078827568.9858.3.camel@chinstrap
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 21:01, Nick Barr wrote:
> Stephen Robert Norris wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 14:50, Joseph Shraibman wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Stephen Robert Norris wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Is this true? Did they really double the size of the memory bus, or is
> >>>it a case of 4 CPUs fighting for the same memory bandwidth that 2 had
> >>>before?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Opertons have built in memory controllers so they scale better than
> >>intel chips. See http://www.anandtech.com/IT/showdoc.html?i=1982
> >>
> >>
> >
> >I didn't realise that. Thanks for the pointer. We're going to be buying
> >some more servers soon, I should look at Opterons I guess...
> >
> > Stephen
> >
> >
> And here is a nice pretty picture of the architecture of a 4 way Opteron.
>
> http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/DownloadableAssets/AM190_briefv3.pdf
>
> I know which architecture I prefer, the one without a central hub.
> Whether the Opteron will perform well for PG I have no idea but we also
> are planning some 4 way Opteron boxes to beef up our data center. We
> will probably do some benchmarking on those bad boys when we get them
> and post it to pgsql-performance if anyone is interested.
>
> Nick

I'd be fascinated.

--
Stephen Norris srn(at)fn(dot)com(dot)au
Farrow Norris Pty Ltd +61 417 243 239

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message javier garcia - CEBAS 2004-03-09 11:46:47 Re: creating sequential timestamp
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-03-09 10:19:09 Re: Character Encoding Confusion