From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Palle Girgensohn <girgen(at)pingpong(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: reduce downtime when upgrading 7.3 -> 7.4 |
Date: | 2004-02-10 14:33:20 |
Message-ID: | 1076423601.17917.8.camel@camel |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Sat, 2004-02-07 at 21:35, Palle Girgensohn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We use postgresql for rather large databases. For a typical installation, a
> pg_restore takes a couple of hours, at least (the dumpfiles are usually 2-4
> gigabytes or so, including BLOBs). The machines are expected to be up 24/7,
> so this dump/restore procedure makes upgrading unpopular. Is there any
> (safe) way to speed this process up?
>
> If pg_upgrade is not a good idea, how can I speed up pg_restore? Best way
> to set things like fsync etc in postgresql.conf? Will it make a big
> difference?
>
yes, setting fsync off should make a significant difference. I usually
recommend it cause if there is a machine failure during restore I will
want to start the process again anyway. Other items you should probably
change are cranking up sort_mem significantly (if your restore is the
only process running, let it take up most of the ram on the box) and you
can increase check_point segments as well. HTH
Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeremy Smith | 2004-02-10 14:45:55 | Upgrading from 7.2 to 7.4.1 on Redhat 7 |
Previous Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2004-02-10 13:19:46 | Re: Diferent Instances |