Re: LWLock/ShmemIndex startup question

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: LWLock/ShmemIndex startup question
Date: 2004-01-27 13:10:32
Message-ID: 1075209033.30531.22906.camel@camel
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 00:21, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >> AFAIK the only target build environment for Windows right now is MinGW/gcc
> >>
> >> If anyone knows how to get the M$ compilers to work nicely with our build
> >> system that might be interesting, but probably at a later stage.
>
> > MS C compiler usage would require gmake and a whole host of other stuff
> > that doesn't seem worth doing.
>
> Um, good point. Porting our Makefiles to anything but gmake seems
> completely out of the question. So unless someone has a Windows build
> environment that has gmake but not gcc, this is moot.
>

Tom, check out
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-ports/2004-01/msg00017.php

Looking at the interix website, they seem to have gmake but no gcc,
which seems to fit into your scenario above. Incedentally they do
distribute a compiled PostgreSQL with their packages, though it's based
on 7.2 according to the author.

Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-01-27 13:51:30 Re: returning PGresult as xml
Previous Message Scott Lamb 2004-01-27 12:58:23 Re: returning PGresult as xml