Re: bytea and vacuum analyze on postgresql 7.3.4

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Radziej <mir(at)suse(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Reinhard Max <max(at)suse(dot)de>
Subject: Re: bytea and vacuum analyze on postgresql 7.3.4
Date: 2003-10-01 23:33:43
Message-ID: 10745.1065051223@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Michael Radziej <mir(at)suse(dot)de> writes:
> I think bytea should accept ANY value and vaccuum analyze must
> not complain about this.

This is fixed as of 7.4, I think (at least your example case doesn't
fail for me). 7.3 was a bit sloppy about how it treated entries in
pg_statistic ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Theodore Petrosky 2003-10-01 23:58:12 Re: is this my date problem
Previous Message Bruno Wolff III 2003-10-01 18:04:05 Re: is this my date problem