Re: question : the choice of the primary key.

From: "Loeke" <LoekeDoeLoekeDoe(at)dontlikespam(dot)hotmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: question : the choice of the primary key.
Date: 2004-01-07 14:17:55
Message-ID: 1073485069.11869@seven.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

> 1.many people make an extra id field and choose this id field to be the
> p-key,
> but then the same person can be present twice in the table (with different
> id fields), the id in itself has no real meaning
> 2.or u can choose the "natural" key for each person, lets say a name and
the
> birthdate of a person make that person unique, so lets make (the whole
name
> en the birthdate) the primary-key; but then if another table X wants to
> refer this table of persons using a foreign key, this foreign key exists
out
> of 3 fields, which smells redundant

i solved it for now
using a p-key (the short id)
and a a-key (the natural key),
so integrity is ok and refences are short.

>
> u have often this choice in determining the primary keys,
>
> plz give me your opinions, options i overlooked or usefull comments.
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas 2004-01-07 17:09:04 Notation of index
Previous Message Kenneth Gonsalves 2004-01-07 14:17:32 unique constraints