Re: MySQL drops support for most distributions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Markus Schiltknecht <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>
Cc: "John D(dot) Burger" <john(at)mitre(dot)org>, pgsql general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: MySQL drops support for most distributions
Date: 2006-12-13 19:21:55
Message-ID: 10724.1166037715@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Markus Schiltknecht <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> writes:
> John D. Burger wrote:
>> Sure, but they won't use PG either, for essentially the same reason,
>> since =all= PG support is "third party".

> So one can debate if i.e. EnterpriseDB is providing third party support
> for PostgreSQL or first-hand support for their own product :-)

The other point I'd make against John's argument is that there are a
whole lot of Fortune 500 companies buying Red Hat support, and RH is
effectively a third party for large chunks of Linux. (Of course,
there are also large chunks for which Red Hat employees write as much
code as anyone; but certainly that's not true for every package.)

I think the real criterion for big companies is not so much whether
you're supporting your "own" product as whether you're big enough to
be worth suing if things go wrong.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard P. Welty 2006-12-13 19:43:15 selinux/postgresql/jfs
Previous Message Roderick A. Anderson 2006-12-13 19:20:35 Re: changing the permission of _lots_ of tables