Re: Tired of -Wold-style-definition already

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Kevin HaleBoyes <khaleboyes(at)chartwelltechnology(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Tired of -Wold-style-definition already
Date: 2004-11-18 01:44:53
Message-ID: 10718.1100742293@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Kevin HaleBoyes <khaleboyes(at)chartwelltechnology(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> That's because you're using a badly broken flex:
> % flex --version
> flex 2.5.31

> That is, configure could check the version of various tools, like
> flex, and warn if appropriate.

It does, although I find that the warnings are of little use since
people tend not to read every line of configure's output. (We can't
make it error out, only warn, because you aren't necessarily going
to use the installed flex anyway...)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-11-18 01:49:20 Re: are there any cons to linking libstdc++ with postgresql?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-11-18 01:41:47 Re: Tired of -Wold-style-definition already