Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> * maxim(dot)boguk(at)gmail(dot)com (maxim(dot)boguk(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
>> It seems that documentation wrong or [ CASCADE | RESTRICT ] feature of ALTER
>> TYPE ... RENAME TO isn't implemented.
> Actually, I'm pretty sure it's implemented but the grammar for it was
> broken during refactoring to have all the ALTER .. RENAME operations go
> through the same code paths.
Are we sure the documentation's not wrong? A quick test says this
syntax isn't accepted in *any* existing release, and I can't say I
understand what it should do anyway.
regards, tom lane