From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #1150: grant options not properly checked |
Date: | 2004-05-11 15:57:46 |
Message-ID: | 10704.1084291066@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> writes:
> While browsing the Access Rules of <revoke statement>... it is unclear.
I generally find SQL92 easier to read than SQL99. In SQL92,
section 11.37 <revoke statement> says
8) For every combination of <grantee> and <action> on O specified
in <privileges>, if there is no corresponding privilege de-
scriptor in the set of identified privilege descriptors, then a
completion condition is raised: warning-privilege not revoked.
9) If ALL PRIVILEGES was specified, then for each <grantee>, if
no privilege descriptors were identified, then a completion
condition is raised: warning-privilege not revoked.
which seems parallel to the GRANT case: warning, but no error.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2004-05-11 16:20:34 | Re: BUG #1150: grant options not properly checked |
Previous Message | Fabien COELHO | 2004-05-11 15:51:10 | Re: BUG #1150: grant options not properly checked |