From: | "cnliou" <cnliou(at)so-net(dot)net(dot)tw> |
---|---|
To: | "" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL is much faster than MySQL, only when... |
Date: | 2003-11-26 09:41:44 |
Message-ID: | 1069839704.88252.cnliou@so-net.net.tw |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
>> I'm curious as to what type of application you run and
what first
>> prompted you to switch to postgresql?
I would like to add my 2 cents to this although I have not
been asked by anyone about this :-)
If I remember correctly the fact about 7 years ago...
when PostgreSQL already supported
- sub-query
- transaction
- triggers
- stored procedures (functions)
, mySQL did not have any of these critical and essential
capabilities required by any serious bussiness applications.
When I noticed that fact, I have never turned my head back
to mySQL again since then. Why? Because I thought I would
take a train instead of a plane (if it indeed is), when I am
100% sure that the plane will not fly due to bad wether.
Regards,
CN
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Meskes | 2003-11-26 09:51:42 | Re: Embedded Vacuum Still Not Working... |
Previous Message | cnliou | 2003-11-26 09:02:33 | Re: TIMEZONE not working? |