Re: PostgreSQL is much faster than MySQL, only when...

From: "cnliou" <cnliou(at)so-net(dot)net(dot)tw>
To: "" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL is much faster than MySQL, only when...
Date: 2003-11-26 09:41:44
Message-ID: 1069839704.88252.cnliou@so-net.net.tw
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

>> I'm curious as to what type of application you run and
what first
>> prompted you to switch to postgresql?

I would like to add my 2 cents to this although I have not
been asked by anyone about this :-)

If I remember correctly the fact about 7 years ago...
when PostgreSQL already supported
- sub-query
- transaction
- triggers
- stored procedures (functions)
, mySQL did not have any of these critical and essential
capabilities required by any serious bussiness applications.

When I noticed that fact, I have never turned my head back
to mySQL again since then. Why? Because I thought I would
take a train instead of a plane (if it indeed is), when I am
100% sure that the plane will not fly due to bad wether.

Regards,

CN

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Meskes 2003-11-26 09:51:42 Re: Embedded Vacuum Still Not Working...
Previous Message cnliou 2003-11-26 09:02:33 Re: TIMEZONE not working?