From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 7.4 official docs : Fonts? |
Date: | 2003-11-19 22:20:15 |
Message-ID: | 1069280415.10335.9734.camel@camel |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-www |
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 15:10, Josh Berkus wrote:
> People,
>
> > of varied sizes. The usage for different types
> > of objects seems to be fairly consistent,
> > however, the varied sizes of the different fonts
> > make things very hard to read.
>
> Elein is correct, our variety of styles does look odd and can cause issues
> with readability. See, for example,
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/functions-string.html
>
> Can we experiment with different SGML-to-HMTL font styles to find one that's a
> little easier on the eyes? What I find particularly difficult are the
> function parameter columns; the mix of "normal" italics with "bold" italics.
>
> Comments? Responses?
>
Whatever we had in 7.3 we should switch back to:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.3/static/functions-string.html
Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Randolf Richardson, DevNet SysOp 29 | 2003-11-19 22:38:12 | Re: 7.4 official docs : Fonts? |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-11-19 20:10:34 | Re: 7.4 official docs : Fonts? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Randolf Richardson, DevNet SysOp 29 | 2003-11-19 22:38:12 | Re: 7.4 official docs : Fonts? |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2003-11-19 21:41:59 | Re: Site designs, upgrades, and Konqueror |