From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | sailesh(at)cs(dot)berkeley(dot)edu |
Cc: | Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the |
Date: | 2003-11-19 21:00:46 |
Message-ID: | 1069275646.10323.9571.camel@camel |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 10:47, Sailesh Krishnamurthy wrote:
> >>>>> "Mike" == Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com> writes:
>
> Mike> Robert Treat wrote:
>
> >> While some form of bitmapped indexing would be cool, other ideas might
> >> be to implement different buffer manager strategies. I was impressed by
> >> how quickly Jan was able to implement ARC over LRU, but there are a host
> >> of other strategies that could also be implemented.
>
> We already do that !
>
:-)
> We have a first "warm-up" assignment for which they get 2 weeks and
> have to change the strategy to MRU from LRU (in an earlier semester
> they were assigned 2Q). The idea here more to just get used to the
> code and the debugger.
>
It would be cool if some of these were posted to -patches... *in theory*
it would give folks a chance to do real stress testing on different
implementations. if nothing else we could bug Jan some more about making
the buffer management code configurable ;-)
Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Cornelia Boenigk | 2003-11-19 21:37:47 | Re: Of Conventions: PHPCon & Comdex |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2003-11-19 20:37:29 | Ahhhh.... last pg_ctl post |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Manfred Spraul | 2003-11-19 21:07:57 | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] SRA Win32 sync() code |
Previous Message | strk | 2003-11-19 20:42:15 | with(isstrict) vs ISSTRICT |