From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Site designs, upgrades, and Konqueror |
Date: | 2003-11-19 20:59:36 |
Message-ID: | 1069275576.10323.9566.camel@camel |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
<note that only 1/2 of this thread has come through to me>
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 12:12, Dave Page wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Josh Berkus [mailto:josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com]
> Next time, once the files are submitted to the web team, we must ensure
> that *all* changes are made direct to the CVS. Barring emergencies, I'm
> the only person that should be editting anything in the live webspace as
> I'm the only one that can commit changes from there back to CVS.
>
Well, I'm guilty of having made changes on the live server in the past,
though I think I have always sent a note immediately afterword to you
informing you of the change. One potential issue we have all had though
is that when developing the site you need a copy of the database on hand
in order to get things working. I've manually pulled these down for
myself in the past, but would you see an issue with checking in a
pg_dump of the www server to cvs, so others could recreate a copy of the
site?
Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2003-11-19 21:10:04 | [Fwd: [pgsql-advocacy] Keeping 7.4 the top news item of the week] |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2003-11-19 20:11:10 | Re: Site designs, upgrades, and Konqueror |