Re: PlPython

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PlPython
Date: 2003-06-26 17:34:13
Message-ID: 1069.1056648853@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> writes:
> In what version is rexec removed? v2.3? If so, then there are
> many people with Python 2.2 and even 2.1 who could still use
> trusted PlPython.

Only if they don't mind being exposed to well-publicized security holes.
If we continued to support the rexec-based version, we'd be
irresponsible to keep marking it trusted ... so there's little point in
keeping it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Doug McNaught 2003-06-26 17:35:07 Re: PlPython
Previous Message Andrew Gould 2003-06-26 17:31:38 MS Access, pgsqlODBC and PostgreSQL in Linux via Crossover Office --> not reliable

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Doug McNaught 2003-06-26 17:35:07 Re: PlPython
Previous Message Fernando Nasser 2003-06-26 17:28:41 pg_guc