| From: | James Rogers <jamesr(at)best(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | ow <oneway_111(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Which hardware/filesystem for postgresql? |
| Date: | 2003-11-14 22:47:09 |
| Message-ID: | 1068850029.16965.280.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 10:54, ow wrote:
> --- James Rogers <jamesr(at)best(dot)com> wrote:
> > I've just received the okay to purchase maxed out SMP Opteron servers
> > with Fiber Channel storage arrays to run Postgres, and those will be
> > Linux with XFS file systems as well.
>
> Any particular brand of the storage array you'd recommend? Thanks
Not really. I haven't settled on any specific vendor at this point,
I've just been given the okay to massively upgrade our core database
systems to 64-bit mid-rangy iron, which I've scheduled for 1Q2004.
Since we use Postgres on Linux, that means big Opteron boxes that are
maxed out.
If things keep going like they are, I could shortly be running on of the
biggest PostgreSQL implementations out there. That could be both good
AND bad. :-)
Cheers,
-James Rogers
jamesr(at)best(dot)com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oli Sennhauser | 2003-11-14 23:14:18 | Re: ER diagram tool for PostgresSQL7.3 |
| Previous Message | Shane Wright | 2003-11-14 22:44:12 | Re: Trying to pg_restore a 7.1.3 db into 7.3.4 - stalling at 100% |