From: | Alessio Bragadini <alessio(at)albourne(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: What do you want me to do? |
Date: | 2003-11-07 21:31:15 |
Message-ID: | 1068240675.3617.10.camel@musa |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 23:07, Tom Lane wrote:
> FWIW, I would like to try a bugzilla-based tracking system for Postgres.
> Red Hat has been using a PG-based version of bugzilla for some time.
> I'm not sure what the holdup is in getting that work merged back
> upstream, but I'd sure like to see it happen.
Actually, the porting of Bugzilla to PostgreSQL has been under
development for some time. Or, to put it more precisely, it's an effort
to clean up the code from any MySQL-ism in order to run on different
databases.
Bug #98304 dedicated to PostgreSQL has been unfortunately opened for a
long time, you can see the discussion at
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98304
and the target release is the upcoming 2.18 - but targets have been
delayed before. I haven't checked recently if anything works right now.
Red Hat's port is more of a "hack" applied to a specific version of
Bugzilla. See http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98304#c57
IMHO it would be a good idea to help the Bugzilla team to finish the
port in time for release 2.18 and join a very active tool.
--
Alessio Bragadini <alessio(at)albourne(dot)com>
APL Financial Services (Overseas) Ltd
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2003-11-07 21:37:12 | Re: What do you want me to do? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-11-07 21:26:29 | Re: What do you want me to do? |