Re: machine-readable explain output

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Subject: Re: machine-readable explain output
Date: 2009-06-14 14:52:49
Message-ID: 10681.1244991169@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> writes:
> On 6/14/09, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I thing so using --with-libxml is good idea.

> That will mean we never get to use XML explain in pgAdmin.

Exactly. We are *not* going to make libxml a required piece of
infrastructure, and that means that XML-format explain output will
be useless to most client tools if it doesn't work without libxml.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-06-14 14:59:07 Re: machine-readable explain output
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-06-14 12:57:52 Re: machine-readable explain output