Re: performance problem - 10.000 databases

From: Marek Florianczyk <franki(at)tpi(dot)pl>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: performance problem - 10.000 databases
Date: 2003-11-05 18:55:50
Message-ID: 1068058550.28821.188.camel@franki-laptop.tpi.pl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

W liście z śro, 05-11-2003, godz. 19:52, Tom Lane pisze:
> Marek Florianczyk <franki(at)tpi(dot)pl> writes:
> > Maybe reconnect is to often, but how to explain that reular queries like
> > select * from table1 ale much faster than \d's ? ( my post to Jeff )
>
> [ further experimentation... ] Ah-hah, I see the problem in 7.3, though
> not in 7.4 which is what I was testing to begin with. 7.4 is smarter
> about optimizing the LEFT JOINs that are used in \d's queries.
>

So how do you think
sould I try v7.4 on production machine and wait for stable version?
Or better use v7.3 with 3000 databases?
I have to do that till december.
Will this optimization solve problem "\d" queries, or just speed it up
few seconds ?

greetings
Marek

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kris Kiger 2003-11-05 19:17:48 why can't select for update be used with join
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-11-05 18:52:14 Re: performance problem - 10.000 databases