| From: | Marek Florianczyk <franki(at)tpi(dot)pl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> |
| Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: performance problem - 10.000 databases |
| Date: | 2003-11-05 16:44:28 |
| Message-ID: | 1068050668.28821.143.camel@franki-laptop.tpi.pl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
W liście z śro, 05-11-2003, godz. 17:24, Andrew Sullivan pisze:
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 08:48:52AM -0500, Jeff wrote:
> >
> > as far as I know, -HUP won't make things like shared buffer changes
> > take. you need a full restart of PG.
>
> It definitely will not. Anything that can only be set on "startup"
> actually means startup.
>
> > but your numbers are different... I guess it did take. huh.
>
> No, that probably just means that there is more variability to runs
> than people like to imagine.
It look's like I will have to make this tests again. It's not big deal,
just when I solve slow "\d table" problem.
VACUUM ANALYZE in progress...
thanks,
Marek
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-11-05 17:59:49 | Re: performance problem - 10.000 databases |
| Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2003-11-05 16:24:07 | Re: performance problem - 10.000 databases |