| From: | Michelle Murrain <tech(at)murrain(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Geoffrey <esoteric(at)3times25(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Microsoft access verses postgresql |
| Date: | 2003-11-05 02:14:02 |
| Message-ID: | 1067998442.2648.185.camel@grizzly.ursa-minor.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 12:46, Geoffrey wrote:
> I've got a client who is following my suggestion that they replace a set
> of excel spreadsheets with a database solution. They are looking at two
> proposals, postgresql solution or an Access solution. The requirements
> will include vpn connectivity from one site to another. It appears they
> will be going with the Access solution. I've got concerns regarding
> this based on research I've done that seems to indicate that Access,
> when used in a multi-user solution is easily corrupted. Does anyone
> have any knowledge/experience with such issues?
Um, use both??
We've been having some success using Access front ends with postgresql
back ends. Takes away the data corruption/scalability issues, but keeps
the strength of the Access reporting and data entry interfaces.
--
.Michelle
---------------------------
Michelle Murrain
mmurrain(at)dbdes(dot)com
Database Designs Associates, Inc.
Boston 617.889.0929
Amherst 413.253.2874
Cell 413.222.6350
www.dbdes.com
AIM:pearlbear0 ICQ:129250575
"Our capacity to make peace with another person and with the world
depends very much on our capacity to make peace with ourselves." -- Thich Nhat Hanh
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Geoffrey | 2003-11-05 02:39:03 | Re: Microsoft access verses postgresql |
| Previous Message | kbd | 2003-11-05 01:44:27 | Re: Microsoft access verses postgresql |