Re: Alter index rename concurrently to

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrey Klychkov <aaklychkov(at)mail(dot)ru>, Victor Yegorov <vyegorov(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Alter index rename concurrently to
Date: 2018-07-31 21:25:18
Message-ID: 10678.1533072318@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 27/07/2018 16:16, Robert Haas wrote:
>> I also suspect that an appropriate fix might be to ensure that
>> AcceptInvalidationMessages() is run at least once at the beginning of
>> parse analysis.

> Why don't we just do that?

Don't we do that already? Certainly it should get run in advance of
any relation name lookup. There is one at transaction start also,
if memory serves.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-07-31 21:28:41 Re: Online enabling of checksums
Previous Message Andres Freund 2018-07-31 21:23:44 Re: Online enabling of checksums