| From: | Marek Florianczyk <franki(at)tpi(dot)pl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Matt Clark <matt(at)ymogen(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: performance problem - 10.000 databases |
| Date: | 2003-10-31 12:35:30 |
| Message-ID: | 1067603729.22285.99.camel@franki-laptop.tpi.pl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
W liście z pią, 31-10-2003, godz. 13:33, Matt Clark pisze:
> > W liście z pią, 31-10-2003, godz. 12:25, Matt Clark pisze:
> > > Ooh, I see. That's a tricky one. Do you really need that level of separation?
> >
> > Well, if you talk with the clients, and they promise, that they will not
> > access to other databasess, and specially don't do "drop database
> > my_bes_fried_db"
> > I can put:
> > host any any 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 trust
> > in the very beginning of pg_hba.conf ;)
>
> I was more thinking that it might be possible to manage the security at a different level than the DB.
Well why not, but I'cant see any solution. As far as I know only
limitation to connect to any database is pg_hba.conf
Marek
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jamie Lawrence | 2003-10-31 12:54:33 | Re: performance problem - 10.000 databases |
| Previous Message | Matt Clark | 2003-10-31 12:33:12 | Re: performance problem - 10.000 databases |