Re: performance problem - 10.000 databases

From: Marek Florianczyk <franki(at)tpi(dot)pl>
To: Matt Clark <matt(at)ymogen(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: performance problem - 10.000 databases
Date: 2003-10-31 11:08:08
Message-ID: 1067598488.22286.69.camel@franki-laptop.tpi.pl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

W liście z pią, 31-10-2003, godz. 11:52, Matt Clark pisze:
> > I could made persistent connection, but with 10.000 clients it will kill
> > the server.
>
> But if they're virtual domains, why would you need one connection per domain? You should only need one connection per apache
> process...

Because every virtual domain has its own database, username and
password. So one client domain1.com with db: domain1db user: domain1user
cannot access to second client database domain2.com db: domain2db user:
domain2user
pg_hba.conf look like this:
host domain1db domain1user ip_addr netmask md5
host domain2db domain2user ip_addr netmask md5
.....
....
10.000 records
...
...
host domain10000db domain10000user ip_addr netmask md5

You know, one client cannot access to other client database.
So, if one process is connected to domain1db it cannto access to
domain2db, and others.

greetings
Marek

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matt Clark 2003-10-31 11:25:21 Re: performance problem - 10.000 databases
Previous Message Matt Clark 2003-10-31 10:52:07 Re: performance problem - 10.000 databases