From: | Marek Florianczyk <franki(at)tpi(dot)pl> |
---|---|
To: | Matt Clark <matt(at)ymogen(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: performance problem - 10.000 databases |
Date: | 2003-10-31 11:08:08 |
Message-ID: | 1067598488.22286.69.camel@franki-laptop.tpi.pl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
W liście z pią, 31-10-2003, godz. 11:52, Matt Clark pisze:
> > I could made persistent connection, but with 10.000 clients it will kill
> > the server.
>
> But if they're virtual domains, why would you need one connection per domain? You should only need one connection per apache
> process...
Because every virtual domain has its own database, username and
password. So one client domain1.com with db: domain1db user: domain1user
cannot access to second client database domain2.com db: domain2db user:
domain2user
pg_hba.conf look like this:
host domain1db domain1user ip_addr netmask md5
host domain2db domain2user ip_addr netmask md5
.....
....
10.000 records
...
...
host domain10000db domain10000user ip_addr netmask md5
You know, one client cannot access to other client database.
So, if one process is connected to domain1db it cannto access to
domain2db, and others.
greetings
Marek
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Matt Clark | 2003-10-31 11:25:21 | Re: performance problem - 10.000 databases |
Previous Message | Matt Clark | 2003-10-31 10:52:07 | Re: performance problem - 10.000 databases |