Re: Press Release

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Press Release
Date: 2003-10-29 22:59:34
Message-ID: 1067468374.2070.29962.camel@camel
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 17:24, Josh Berkus wrote:
> If anybody has evidence that the FSM index management doens't work, then we'll
> cut the paragraph. However, I'm inclined to trust Tom & Co., and my only
> simple tests seemed to uphold the Lazy-Vacuum-ability of indexes.

Tom has laid out at least one case where the potential for index growth
exits, though I don't see it in a quick search of the archives...

Tom, can you weigh in here?

Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message scott.marlowe 2003-10-29 23:03:50 Re: Press Release
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2003-10-29 22:58:42 Re: Press Release and eRServer