| From: | Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera Munoz <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Ian Barwick <barwick(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Autocomplete <TAB> on Postgres7.4beta5 not |
| Date: | 2003-10-29 03:22:14 |
| Message-ID: | 1067397733.99917.21.camel@jester |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 19:34, scott.marlowe wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > "scott.marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> writes:
> > > Is it possible to remove the implicit search path of pg_catalog from a
> > > psql session without it breaking lots of stuff?
> >
> > Do you consider "+", "count()", etc to be important stuff?
>
> Me, hardly ever use them :-) So I can assume that removing the implicit
> pg_catalog from the search path is a "bad thing."
From the search_path certainly -- but we can we teach the difference
between implicit and explicit to the *is_visible functions?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | kedar kompalli | 2003-10-29 12:49:04 | installation and configuration of postgresql |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-10-29 01:53:48 | Re: [HACKERS] Autocomplete <TAB> on Postgres7.4beta5 not working? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-10-29 03:36:00 | Re: pg_ctl reports succes when start fails |
| Previous Message | John DeSoi | 2003-10-29 02:38:29 | Re: shared memory on OS X - 7.4beta4 |