From: | Lynn(dot)Tilby(at)asu(dot)edu |
---|---|
To: | darren(at)crystalballinc(dot)com |
Cc: | Lynn(dot)Tilby(at)asu(dot)edu, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: no records returned |
Date: | 2003-10-26 02:48:52 |
Message-ID: | 1067136532.3f9b36142ec96@webmail.asu.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Darren,
Thanks for the thoughts...
stck_sym is a varchar the rest are int's and floats's.
Do you think that the size of the table could be part of the problem,
at 600000+ records?
Lynn
> exact amount in the field. i.e.
>
> char(5)
>
> da will be padded da and 0s on the end up to the sizeof the char
> field.
>
> If varchar then you will be ok.
>
> If you do have a char then use the trim function to do the selects
>
> HTH
> Darren
>
> On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 Lynn(dot)Tilby(at)asu(dot)edu wrote:
>
> >
> > running - (PostgreSQL) 7.1.3
> >
> > I have loaded a table with stock market data.
> >
> > -
> > -
> > -
> > ZRAN |2003-09-29| 20030929| 731487| 20.81| 20.
> > ZRAN |2003-09-30| 20030930| 731488| 19.43| 20.1
> > ZRAN |2003-10-01| 20031001| 731489| 19.82| 19.9
> > ZRAN |2003-10-02| 20031002| 731490| 19.56| 20.3
> > ZRAN |2003-10-03| 20031003| 731491| 20.25| 21.
> > (609398 rows)
> >
> > pma=> select count(*) from stck_dta_tbl_oprtnl;
> > count
> > ------
> > 609398
> >
> > When I do a select * from stck_dta_tbl_oprtnl; I get the whole table
> > just fine; but when I try and retrieve just 1 record which is out
> > put when doing the select * ie:
> >
> > pma=> select * from stck_dta_tbl_oprtnl where stck_sym = 'ZRAN';
> > stck_sym|dta_date|dta_date_num|dta_date_dys|opn|hi|lw|cls|vol|unk
> > --------+--------+------------+------------+---+--+--+---+---+---
> > (0 rows)
> >
> > I get 0 rows, and no errors from postmaster.
> >
> > Is there a limit to the number of rows in a table?
> > I have also tried building a unique index composed of the stck_sym
> and
> > dta_date but I still get 0 rows.
> >
> > I have also noticed that when setting up a cursor that the first
> fetch
> > does NOT get the first record in the table, it also returns nothing
> with
> > no errors from the postmaster. I am wondering if these bugs are
> related.
> >
> > Thanks all for your help!!!!
> >
> > Lynn
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
> >
>
> --
> Darren Ferguson
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-10-26 02:56:15 | Re: Temporary tables and miscellaneous schemas |
Previous Message | John DeSoi | 2003-10-26 01:01:13 | Re: shared memory on OS X - 7.4beta4 |