| From: | Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: multi-backend psql |
| Date: | 2003-10-23 13:09:00 |
| Message-ID: | 1066914539.77557.26.camel@jester |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> >Nay... I would expect a PostgreSQL specific information_schema to get
> >just as much mucking around as the system tables, which means you are
> >still maintaining a set of queries per release.
> >
> >
> The problem about information_schema is that it's restricted to show
> objects of the owner only. This is by spec, but will prevent us from
> seeing all we need.
> This might get better if we get rules.
Well... That, and it only describes about 1/2 of the features in
PostgreSQL.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-10-23 13:09:11 | Re: is GiST still alive? |
| Previous Message | Bob Badour | 2003-10-23 12:28:05 | Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL |