From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | more improvements to release notes |
Date: | 2003-10-22 06:24:03 |
Message-ID: | 1066803843.374.76.camel@tokyo |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
This patch makes a bunch of improvements to the release notes. I only
modified release.sgml -- HISTORY will need to be regenerated.
I was able to remove almost all of the "Other uncategorized" release
note entries, but left a few that I wasn't sure what to do with. We
should remove this section, and move the remaining entries to other
sections if necessary.
I had a few questions on some of the entries:
What is the following release note entry supposed to mean? "FETCH 0"
doesn't "do nothing", it now fetches the current cursor row. Bruce,
could you clarify this please?
* MOVE/FETCH 0 now does nothing; return value of MOVE/FETCH 1/0
varies based on the current offset in the cursor
This entry is plainly wrong:
* Cause FETCH 1 to return the current cursor row, or zero if at
beginning/end of cursor, per SQL spec (Bruce)
FETCH 0 is what actually returns the current cursor row, and returning
"zero" when a row value is expected wouldn't make much sense. I've
changed it to just say:
* Cause FETCH 0 to return the current cursor row, per SQL spec
(Bruce)
If I've missed some of the intent of the original entry, let me know.
These two entries are duplicates, right?
* Have SHOW DATESTYLE generate output similar to that used by SET
DATESTYLE (Tom)
* Change DATESTYLE to output its value in a more common format
(Tom)
I wasn't sure, so I didn't make this change in the patch.
-Neil
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
relnotes-improv-2.patch | text/x-patch | 24.0 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-10-22 07:21:23 | Timestamp docs weirdness |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-10-22 02:49:47 | Re: [HACKERS] obj_description problems? |