From: | Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
Cc: | Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: multi-backend psql |
Date: | 2003-10-21 13:21:42 |
Message-ID: | 1066742501.68643.1.camel@jester |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2003-10-21 at 09:03, Andreas Pflug wrote:
> Rod Taylor wrote:
>
> > I'm sure the pgAdmin group likes that idea (they're probably tired of maintaining 4 different versions of
> >queries for getting a list of tables). Any solution to make psql backward or forward compatible should go an additional step to assist other frontends as well.
> >
> >
> While I can agree on the statements that frontends like backend support
> functions, in the case of tables for pgAdmin3 helper functions/views
> don't seem too helpful. pgAdmin3 will not only try to display all
> supported backend versions (currently 7.3, 7.4) correctly, but also
> enable/disable additional functionality. Having different queries for
> different backends is just a small part of the game, and the easiest one
> too. Hiding the backend differences behind views or functions wouldn't
> help too much.
Of course, psql has the same issue in hiding functionality that doesn't
exist. My biggest beef is the psql help is often misleading if you're
connected to a different backend.
This would need to be a part of a solution if we're going to get
anything out of it.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2003-10-21 13:33:38 | Re: multi-backend psql |
Previous Message | Andreas Pflug | 2003-10-21 13:03:14 | Re: multi-backend psql |