Re: multi-backend psql

From: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: multi-backend psql
Date: 2003-10-21 03:00:32
Message-ID: 1066705230.63032.85.camel@jester
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2003-10-20 at 22:39, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > The tricky part seems to be dealing with i10n issues since the text to
> > translate would be release specific it needs to go into the backend --
> > but that isn't so nice.
>
> Why tricky? I'm just going to make the 7.5 psql utility work against
> previous versions of postgresql. Any strings in that utility are
> translatable like any other.

I suppose if all you want is backward compatibility which makes sense
for pg_dump, but surely psql should be forward thinking.

Normally it's old clients with new server, not the other way around --
at least with big companies it seems easier to get a server upgraded
than everyones desktop.

Forward looking means pulling the available commands, queries, etc from
the backend. It actually works quite well (submitted a patch quite a
while ago) in all respects except string translation.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-21 03:13:19 Re: Looks like we'll have a beta5 ...
Previous Message Christopher Browne 2003-10-21 02:54:48 Re: pg_autovacuum and VACUUM FREEZE