| From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Sun performance - Major discovery! |
| Date: | 2003-10-08 16:41:56 |
| Message-ID: | 1065631316.3423.2.camel@tokyo |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 10:48, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> My worry about this test is that it gives us precious little
> knowledge about concurrent connection slowness, which is where I find
> the most significant problems.
As Jeff points out, the second set of results is for 20 concurrent
connections. Note that the advantage sunsoft cc has over gcc decreases
as the number of connections increases (which makes sense, as the 20x
workload is likely to be more I/O bound).
-Neil
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Manfred Spraul | 2003-10-08 16:50:21 | Re: IDE Drives and fsync |
| Previous Message | Kris Kiger | 2003-10-08 16:15:04 | Postgres-R |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joe Conway | 2003-10-08 16:46:43 | Re: Compare rows |
| Previous Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2003-10-08 16:37:45 | Re: Compare rows |