Re: Stored procedures

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: Yolanda Phillips <yphillips(at)dlkconsulting(dot)co(dot)za>
Cc: "\"'Pgsql-Jdbc(at)Postgresql(dot) \"Org'" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Stored procedures
Date: 2003-10-03 12:11:09
Message-ID: 1065183069.24288.53.camel@camel
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Yes, this is correct. You can increase the limit by recompiling, though
there a believed to be some performance issues associated with choosing
a limit higher than 32. search the mail archives for the specifics of
where you need to do this in the code.

Robert Treat

On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 01:47, Yolanda Phillips wrote:
> Good day,
>
> I need help URGENTLY!!
>
> I'm trying to compile a Stored Function that performs either an insert
> or an
> update on a table. The function has 44 input parameters and returns an
> integer. When compiling the function a get an error:
>
> ERROR: functions cannot have more than 32 arguments
>
> I would just like someone to confirm this. Can a function only have 32
> input
> parameters? If so, I'd have to use Prepared Statements then.
>
> Thank you in advance.
>
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
> Yolanda Phillips
> Web Applications Developer
>
>
>
> ----
>

>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)

--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2003-10-03 12:14:56 Re: Postgresql 7.3.4 download problem
Previous Message teknokrat 2003-10-03 11:33:07 Re: Concurrent Connections - User only allowed one