From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Yolanda Phillips <yphillips(at)dlkconsulting(dot)co(dot)za> |
Cc: | "\"'Pgsql-Jdbc(at)Postgresql(dot) \"Org'" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Stored procedures |
Date: | 2003-10-03 12:11:09 |
Message-ID: | 1065183069.24288.53.camel@camel |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Yes, this is correct. You can increase the limit by recompiling, though
there a believed to be some performance issues associated with choosing
a limit higher than 32. search the mail archives for the specifics of
where you need to do this in the code.
Robert Treat
On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 01:47, Yolanda Phillips wrote:
> Good day,
>
> I need help URGENTLY!!
>
> I'm trying to compile a Stored Function that performs either an insert
> or an
> update on a table. The function has 44 input parameters and returns an
> integer. When compiling the function a get an error:
>
> ERROR: functions cannot have more than 32 arguments
>
> I would just like someone to confirm this. Can a function only have 32
> input
> parameters? If so, I'd have to use Prepared Statements then.
>
> Thank you in advance.
>
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
> Yolanda Phillips
> Web Applications Developer
>
>
>
> ----
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2003-10-03 12:14:56 | Re: Postgresql 7.3.4 download problem |
Previous Message | teknokrat | 2003-10-03 11:33:07 | Re: Concurrent Connections - User only allowed one |