From: | Cindy <ctmoore(at)uci(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: sun solaris & postgres |
Date: | 2002-05-20 21:09:34 |
Message-ID: | 10648.1021928974@stephanus.tlg.uci.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
No, if you read more carefully, att is the one that is performing its
operations an order of magnitude faster than steph, which is why we're
so stumped. But I think I located the problem (see other email).
Darren Ferguson writes:
>That could be why 7.1.3 is out performing it has 8 times more memory than
>the 7.2.1 machine
>
>What about CPU's, controllers and are both config files the same for steph
>and att?
>
>Darren Ferguson
>
>On Mon, 20 May 2002, Cindy wrote:
>
>>
>> mpls(at)ipv6(dot)dns2go(dot)com writes:
>> >
>> >Difference specification ??
>> >How many memory in att and steph?
>>
>> steph has
>> Memory size: 4096 Megabytes
>> att has
>> Memory size: 512 Megabytes
>>
>> --Cindy
>>
>> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>>
>> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
>>
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
>http://archives.postgresql.org
>
--
Cindy
ctmoore(at)uci(dot)edu
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | sheetal | 2002-05-20 21:44:06 | Help.. |
Previous Message | Cindy | 2002-05-20 21:05:52 | Re: sun solaris & postgres |