From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Friedrich Dodt <friedrich(dot)dodt(at)efonds24(dot)de>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Where is PLbash ?? |
Date: | 2002-06-25 20:39:48 |
Message-ID: | 10645.1025037588@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> There's a difference between making a dangerous thing possible and
>> encouraging people to do it. But I'll wait and see what Peter thinks.
> I think Peter agrees with you. My point is that we can PL/sh and
> document it's limitations. With perl, the ability is there but it isn't
> obviouis why it is a problem.
Well, there's some merit in that argument: the pl/sh chapter would be an
ideal place to explain in bright red letters why pl/sh is dangerous ;-),
and then we could cross-reference that discussion from plperlu and
pltclu, which don't really have good places to put a long discussion
about the risks.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2002-06-25 20:53:58 | Re: Where is PLbash ?? |
Previous Message | Brett Schwarz | 2002-06-25 19:31:13 | Re: Where is PLbash ?? |