Re: need for in-place upgrades (was Re: State of Beta 2)

From: Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>
To: PgSQL General ML <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: need for in-place upgrades (was Re: State of Beta 2)
Date: 2003-09-19 09:33:00
Message-ID: 1063963979.25251.1701.camel@haggis
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 16:29, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 10:52:45AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> > So instead of 1TB of 15K fiber channel disks (and the requisite
> > controllers, shelves, RAID overhead, etc), we'd need *two* TB of
> > 15K fiber channel disks (and the requisite controllers, shelves,
> > RAID overhead, etc) just for the 1 time per year when we'd upgrade
> > PostgreSQL?
>
> Nope. You also need it for the time when your vendor sells
> controllers or chips or whatever with known flaws, and you end up
> having hardware that falls over 8 or 9 times in a row.

????

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ron Johnson, Jr. ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net
Jefferson, LA USA

"A C program is like a fast dance on a newly waxed dance floor
by people carrying razors."
Waldi Ravens

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christoph Haller 2003-09-19 09:36:35 Re: change of table name - any help
Previous Message Ron Johnson 2003-09-19 09:29:21 Re: PostgreSQL versus MySQL