| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
| Cc: | katsuaki(dot)fukushima(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #16854: initdb fails on ReFS and FAT32 file systems |
| Date: | 2021-02-05 15:26:15 |
| Message-ID: | 106278.1612538775@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> writes:
> On 2021/02/05 13:55, PG Bug reporting form wrote:
>> In Microsoft Windows, initdb fails for ReFS and FAT32 file systems.
>> PostgreSQL 12.x worked fine.
> I'm not sure if ReFS is the supported platform or not.
I certainly don't have a problem with kicking FAT32 to the curb.
But according to
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ReFS
ReFS is Microsoft's latest and greatest attempt at implementing a modern
file system. I'd quantify the greatness pretty poorly if they left out
hard links (I wonder what other essentials they didn't bother with)
but maybe we have to support it.
On the third hand, Wikipedia says a bit further down
The ability to create ReFS volumes was removed in Windows 10's 2017
Fall Creators Update for all editions except Enterprise and Pro for
Workstations.[4]
which sounds a whole lot like "we've already given up on this".
If they're not pushing ReFS anymore then I think we can ignore it.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Euler Taveira | 2021-02-05 16:28:29 | Re: BUG #16854: initdb fails on ReFS and FAT32 file systems |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2021-02-05 14:26:51 | Re: BUG #16854: initdb fails on ReFS and FAT32 file systems |