Re: Commercial postgresql

From: Bo Lorentsen <bl(at)netgroup(dot)dk>
To: Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Commercial postgresql
Date: 2003-09-02 09:49:16
Message-ID: 1062496156.25824.7054.camel@localhost
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 04:08, Vivek Khera wrote:

> I use it in 24/7/365 system which is heavily written to and read
> from. The drawbacks I have are:
How depressing, may I ask that PG version you are using ?

> 1) upgrade to major versions require dump/restore which is a
> significant amount of downtime for a large DB.
Ok, this is not a thing you do very often, and it would help is we got a
"diff" (since last backup) pg_dump. As one could install the new DB in
parallel with produktion, and then just apply the diff dump on the db
swap.

> 2) the need to run vacuum on tables to keep them from bloating too
> much. on my system which is very busy, sometimes running vacuum
> pushes the disk beyond its limits and slows the whole system to a
> crawl.
How often does this vacuum run, and how many delete/updates are there in
between ?

> 3) Index bloat is apparently a bigger problem than I thought.
This does not sound too nice !

> If you want commercial support, it is out there. There are at least
> two companies offering it.
But you have not been unsing any of there services ?

/BL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Malcolm Warren 2003-09-02 09:55:21 Use of oids
Previous Message Jason Godden 2003-09-02 09:34:26 Re: automatic update