| From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | hf424(at)protecting(dot)net |
| Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Need concrete "Why Postgres not MySQL" bullet |
| Date: | 2003-08-20 18:57:10 |
| Message-ID: | 1061405830.23871.114.camel@camel |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 13:20, Harald Fuchs wrote:
> > and suffers from
> > complications with the many different "table types".
>
> True. Transactions break unless all tables used are InnoDB.
>
Actually the problem is worse than transactions breaking, the problem is
that they don't break and just silently fail you in some circumstances.
Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ian Barwick | 2003-08-20 22:22:28 | Re: Need concrete "Why Postgres not MySQL" bullet list |
| Previous Message | Autoresponder | 2003-08-20 18:00:42 | Re: Approved |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2003-08-20 18:58:27 | Re: Grouping by date range |
| Previous Message | Stephan Szabo | 2003-08-20 18:56:56 | Re: Buglist |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Manfred Koizar | 2003-08-20 19:21:14 | Again on index correlation |
| Previous Message | Stephan Szabo | 2003-08-20 18:56:56 | Re: Buglist |