Re: query tuning

From: Franco Bruno Borghesi <franco(at)akyasociados(dot)com(dot)ar>
To: dave(at)fastcrypt(dot)com
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: query tuning
Date: 2003-08-15 15:26:12
Message-ID: 1060961172.975.8.camel@taz.oficina
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I usually reduce cpu_index_tuple_cost in postgresql.conf, from 0.001 to
0.000001, this way the optimizer is "more willing" to use indexes.

Of course you should try different values until you find the ones that
adjust to your system configuration.

On Thu, 2003-08-14 at 09:00, Dave Cramer wrote:

> I have a query which definitely runs faster when sequential scans are
> turned off. Which parameters do I tune? and which way?
>
> After quickly perusing the docs, and google, I think it is the
> random_page_cost?
>
> Any help would be appreciated.
>
> Dave

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dennis Gearon 2003-08-15 15:32:03 Re: Why the duplicate messages to pgsql-general?
Previous Message expect 2003-08-15 15:21:28 Re: Why the duplicate messages to pgsql-general?