Re: Perfomance Tuning

From: Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>
To: PgSQL Performance ML <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Perfomance Tuning
Date: 2003-08-13 21:31:16
Message-ID: 1060810275.4577.1.camel@haggis
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 10:46, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Jeff,
>
[snip]
> > The other advantage (which I hinted to above) with raw disks is being able
> > to optimize queries to take advantage of it. Informix is multithreaded
> > and it will spawn off multiple "readers" to do say, a seq scan (and merge
> > the results at the end).
>
> I like this idea. Has it ever been discussed for PostgreSQL? Hmmm .... we'd
> need to see some tests demonstrating that this approach was still a technical
> advantage given the improvements in RAID and FS technology since Informix
> was designed.

Wouldn't PG 1st need horizontal partitioning, and as a precursor to
that, "tablespaces"?

--
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ron Johnson, Jr. Home: ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net |
| Jefferson, LA USA |
| |
| "Man, I'm pretty. Hoo Hah!" |
| Johnny Bravo |
+---------------------------------------------------------------+

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sean Chittenden 2003-08-13 23:23:30 Re: Perfomance Tuning
Previous Message Christopher Browne 2003-08-13 19:07:04 Re: Perfomance Tuning