Re: Perfomance Tuning

From: Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>
To: PgSQL Performance ML <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Perfomance Tuning
Date: 2003-08-13 15:16:03
Message-ID: 1060787763.3996.15.camel@haggis
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 09:37, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jeff <threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org> writes:
> > On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Christopher Browne wrote:
> >> Are you _certain_ that's still true? Have you a metric that shows
> >> Informix being 10x faster on a modern system? That would be quite
> >> surprising...
>
> > We were forced (for budget reason) to switch from raw disk to cooked files
> > on our informix db. We took a huge hit - about 5-6x slower.
> > [snip]
> > The raw disks were on a hitachi fibre array and the cooked files
> > were on a raid5 (scsi). Forget how many spindles in the raid.
> > There were 20 raw disks)
>
> Seems like you can't know how much of the performance hit was due to the
> filesystem change and how much to the hardware change. But I'd bet 20
> disks on fibre array have way more net throughput than a single RAID
> array on scsi.

I wouldn't be surprised either if the fiber array had more cache
than the SCSI controller.

Was/is the Hitachi device a SAN?

--
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ron Johnson, Jr. Home: ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net |
| Jefferson, LA USA |
| |
| "Man, I'm pretty. Hoo Hah!" |
| Johnny Bravo |
+---------------------------------------------------------------+

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ingrid martinez 2003-08-13 15:17:45 Re: How can I Improve performance in Solaris?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-08-13 14:37:31 Re: Perfomance Tuning