| From: | Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Inheritance & multiple-value fields |
| Date: | 2003-08-02 22:09:12 |
| Message-ID: | 1059862152.24818.76.camel@haggis |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sat, 2003-08-02 at 15:26, Vernon Smith wrote:
> We usually use another table for a multi-valued field. Is possible
> having a single multi-valued field table for all tables in the
> same heredity, other than having a multi-valued table for every
> single tables in the heredity?
Sure: Pick, now known as D3.
http://www.rainingdata.com/products/dbms/d3/index.html
However, that breaks the cardinal rule of relational DB design:
http://www.databasejournal.com/sqletc/article.php/26861_1428511_4
--
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ron Johnson, Jr. Home: ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net |
| Jefferson, LA USA |
| |
| "I'm not a vegetarian because I love animals, I'm a vegetarian |
| because I hate vegetables!" |
| unknown |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2003-08-02 23:47:14 | Re: plPHP -- sort of an announcement.. but not commercial |
| Previous Message | Ron Johnson | 2003-08-02 22:02:46 | Re: Domains (Was [PERFORM] Views With Unions) |