From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #4204: COPY to table with FK has memory leak |
Date: | 2008-05-28 22:42:06 |
Message-ID: | 10598.1212014526@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> We certainly need a TODO item for "improve RI checks during bulk
>> operations".
> I have a feeling it's already there. Hm. There's a whole section on RI
> triggers but the closest I see is this, neither of the links appear to refer
> to bulk operations:
> Optimize referential integrity checks
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2005-10/msg00458.php
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-04/msg00744.php
No, both of those are talking about the same thing, ie, (1) making the
are-the-keys-unchanged optimization work when NULLs are present,
and (2) not testing for this case twice.
There's an entry in the Triggers section
* Add deferred trigger queue file
Right now all deferred trigger information is stored in backend
memory. This could exhaust memory for very large trigger queues.
This item involves dumping large queues into files.
but as already noted, this is a pretty myopic answer (at least for
RI triggers).
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-05-28 23:20:26 | Re: BUG #4186: set lc_messages does not work |
Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-05-28 22:17:23 | Re: BUG #4204: COPY to table with FK has memory leak |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sabbiolina | 2008-05-28 23:05:22 | [PERFORM] Memory question on win32 systems |
Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-05-28 22:17:23 | Re: BUG #4204: COPY to table with FK has memory leak |