From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tony Capobianco <tcapobianco(at)prospectiv(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Determine length of numeric field |
Date: | 2011-02-15 21:10:16 |
Message-ID: | 10590.1297804216@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Tony Capobianco <tcapobianco(at)prospectiv(dot)com> writes:
> I'm altering datatypes in several tables from numeric to integer. In
> doing so, I get the following error:
> dw=# \d uniq_hits
> Table "support.uniq_hits"
> Column | Type | Modifiers
> ------------+---------+-----------
> sourceid | numeric |
> hitdate | date |
> total | numeric |
> hitdate_id | integer |
> Indexes:
> "uniq_hits_hitdateid_idx" btree (hitdate_id), tablespace
> "support_idx"
> Tablespace: "support"
> esave_dw=# alter table uniq_hits alter sourceid type int;
> ERROR: integer out of range
> Sourceid should not be more than 5 digits long. I'm able to perform
> this query on Oracle and would like something similar on postgres 8.4:
> delete from uniq_hits where sourceid in (select sourceid from uniq_hits
> where length(sourceid) > 5);
That seems like a pretty bizarre operation to apply to a number. Why
not "where sourceid > 99999"? Or maybe "where abs(sourceid) > 99999"
would be better.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tony Capobianco | 2011-02-15 21:14:35 | Re: Determine length of numeric field |
Previous Message | Tony Capobianco | 2011-02-15 21:09:49 | Re: Determine length of numeric field |