Re: RFC: Removal of support for JDBC1 drivers.

From: Dave Cramer <Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net>
To: Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Barry Lind <blind(at)xythos(dot)com>
Subject: Re: RFC: Removal of support for JDBC1 drivers.
Date: 2003-07-22 10:37:20
Message-ID: 1058870240.11211.57.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Fernando,

Previously the argument for support of jdk1.1 has been applets. I doubt
that this is true anymore.

Dave
On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 11:50, Fernando Nasser wrote:
> Folks,
>
> We can't even get hold of a 1.1 JDK anymore. And it is preventing us from using
> the most basic stuff in the jdbc1 classes because they were introduced in 1.2.
>
> I am proposing we drop support for Java SDK 1.1 and JDBC1 altogether and keep
> only JDBC2 (for SDK 1.2 and SDK 1.3) and JDBC3 (for SDK 1.4).
>
> Concerns?
>
>
> P.S.: I even think support for 1.2 is not necessary. Does anyone know of a
> place where Java 1.2 is still being used? They must have a Java that old and
> still have a reasonably recent backend as the driver only support the last two
> previous versions (will be 7.2+ in the 7.4 release).
--
Dave Cramer <Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net>

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Felipe Schnack 2003-07-22 12:00:45 Re: the IN clause saga
Previous Message Sylwester Rutkowski 2003-07-22 09:25:33 inet type handling