| From: | Csaba Nagy <nagy(at)ecircle-ag(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-jdbc-list <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Prepared Statements |
| Date: | 2003-07-21 15:34:11 |
| Message-ID: | 1058801651.25132.345.camel@coppola.ecircle.de |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Well, looks like Dima's problem can be solved after all while still
being standards compliant in the standard cases :-)
Still, the individual data types should be validated and correctly
escaped. If it counts at all, I would vote with this approach.
Just one more question Dima, how will you at runtime that the current
driver supports this functionality ? (for that matter, how do you know
now ?)
Cheers,
Csaba.
> Oliver,
>
> I think Dima is arguing that Collection could be treated as an special case
> where it indicates a list of something instead of a single something.
>
> So, we would iterate through this Collection using its iterator and, for each
> Object obtained, act like a setObject has been used with that Object and the
> JAVA TYPE as an argument.
>
> The Types.OTHER is used for database specific SQL types or for Dynamic Data
> Access support. As the Collection class is not a data type there is no chance
> of confusion.
>
> It seems that Dima's idea can indeed work.
>
> Regards,
> Fernando
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fernando Nasser | 2003-07-21 15:44:41 | Re: patch: clean up ant test infrastructure |
| Previous Message | Fernando Nasser | 2003-07-21 15:29:03 | Please adjust the subject [Was: Prepared Statements] |