Re: Prepared Statements

From: Kim Ho <kho(at)redhat(dot)com>
To: Dmitry Tkach <dmitry(at)openratings(dot)com>
Cc: Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com>, Barry Lind <blind(at)xythos(dot)com>, pgsql-jdbc-list <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dave Cramer <Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Prepared Statements
Date: 2003-07-18 18:03:22
Message-ID: 1058551402.20165.177.camel@topanga.toronto.redhat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

> >
> >In any case, here is a revised version of the patch. =) Thanks for the
> >pointers.
> >
> I must be missing something, but I don't see any difference with the
> previous version ....
>
There is an attempt to do a:
Double.valueOf(x.toString());

in bindNumbers to ensure that the object's string representation is a
number. This is what you were talking about before right?

About breaking functionality with hex.

I'm not sure about this, maybe we could get other opinions in
(specifically Dave and Barry). I'm not so sure that it should be
allowed. (I am not saying that it is not useful.)

Cheers,

Kim

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Felipe Schnack 2003-07-18 18:16:23 Re: Prepared Statements
Previous Message Dmitry Tkach 2003-07-18 17:53:39 Re: Prepared Statements